
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Kaylind Landes sat down with Judge Loretta Radford, a Tulsa County special judge and candidate for District Judge, District 14, Office 4. They discussed the difference between special and district judges, how Oklahoma’s new sentencing structure may affect criminal cases, the roles of judges and prosecutors in plea agreements, and why preparation, fairness and public participation matter throughout the justice system.
Watch the full conversation below.
Judges make decisions that can directly affect a person’s freedom, family, property and future. Despite that influence, many Oklahomans know considerably more about national elections than the judges appearing on their local ballots.
Managing Attorney Kaylind Landes recently spoke with Judge Loretta Radford about how Oklahoma courts work, what district judges do and why local judicial elections deserve voters’ attention.
Judge Loretta Radford has served as a Tulsa County special judge since 2022. Her legal career began in 1985 and has included work in private practice, criminal defense, public defense, federal prosecution and legal education.
During the conversation, Judge Radford discussed her experience as:
Judge Radford is currently running for District Judge, District 14, Office 4. The nonpartisan race appears on the November 3, 2026 ballot for voters who live within that judicial election district.
A special judge is hired by the elected district judges, while a district judge is elected by voters.
As Judge Radford explained during the interview, special judges are often the “worker bees” of the courthouse. They handle assigned dockets and help courts manage high-volume matters efficiently.
Special judges may work with:
District judges can hear significant civil and criminal cases, including trials. They also perform important administrative functions and participate in hiring the special judges who help operate the courthouse.
Special judges are appointed by district judges. District judges are elected by the public and have broader judicial and administrative responsibilities.
Local judges make decisions that can affect people during some of the most consequential moments of their lives.
Oklahoma state courts address matters involving:
Judges must apply statutes and appellate decisions, but the law cannot anticipate every factual situation. Courts are regularly asked to interpret new laws, address unclear language and decide how legal rules apply to real people.
That is one reason voters should understand the experience, temperament and approach of the judicial candidates appearing on their ballots.
A district judge’s influence extends beyond the cases assigned to that judge.
District judges may help make decisions concerning:
These responsibilities can shape the experiences of attorneys, defendants, victims, families and other community members who rely on the courthouse.
One portion of the conversation focused on guardianship cases.
Someone may agree to become a guardian for a family member without fully understanding the responsibility involved. A guardian has a fiduciary duty to the person under the guardianship, sometimes called the ward. Certain financial, medical and end-of-life decisions may require court approval.
Judge Radford explained that she takes time to help guardians understand those responsibilities. Her comments illustrate an important point: courts do more than decide who wins and loses. Judges must also make legal procedures understandable to people navigating unfamiliar and deeply personal situations.
Oklahoma has moved toward more structured sentencing classifications for many criminal offenses. One goal of sentencing guidelines is to produce greater consistency, so similar cases are not treated dramatically differently solely because they arise in different counties or courtrooms.
Judge Radford and Kaylind discussed three principles that structured sentencing attempts to balance:
However, both emphasized that justice does not begin at sentencing.
Decisions made during the investigation, charging process, discovery and plea negotiations may substantially affect the final outcome.
No. The outcome of a criminal case can be shaped long before sentencing.
Important decisions occur when:
As Judge Radford explained, fairness must be considered throughout the process—not only when a judge announces the sentence.
The prosecutor generally makes an initial plea recommendation, and the defense attorney can negotiate that proposal. The defendant then decides whether to accept or reject the agreement.
The judge is not merely a rubber stamp. A judge may review the proposed resolution and, depending on the circumstances and applicable law, decline to accept it.
The prosecutor decides what charges to file and what resolution the state is willing to recommend. Prosecutors often have access to police reports, videos, witness statements and other information that influences their recommendation.
Defense counsel evaluates the evidence, identifies legal issues, advises the client and negotiates with the prosecutor. The defense attorney should ensure that the client understands the proposal, its alternatives and its long-term consequences.
The judge ensures that any plea is entered knowingly and voluntarily and that the proposed outcome complies with the law. The court may also determine whether it will accept the parties’ agreement.
Every case is different, but outcomes may also vary because individual counties and prosecutors’ offices have their own policies, practices and priorities.
Factors that may affect a case include:
Greater structure may make outcomes more predictable, but no formula can replace a careful review of the individual facts.
Kaylind and Judge Radford also discussed recent changes to Oklahoma DUI law, including circumstances in which a first DUI may be filed as an aggravated or felony offense.
Their conversation highlighted a difficult question: how should the justice system balance public safety with individualized consideration of the person and facts involved?
Impaired driving can create a serious danger to the public. At the same time, a criminal court must consider the evidence, the defendant’s history, the language of the statute and the legal options available in that particular case.
Being charged with a felony does not automatically mean someone has been convicted of one. The evidence and available defenses still matter.
During a lighthearted “legal would you rather” portion of the interview, Kaylind asked Judge Radford whether she would rather enter trial without discovery or without the rules of evidence.
Both chose discovery.
Discovery is the process through which the defense receives evidence connected to the prosecution. Depending on the case, that evidence may include:
Knowing the evidence allows an attorney to investigate, identify inconsistencies and prepare a defense rather than reacting for the first time in court.
A criminal case is not simply a disagreement between two sides. A person’s liberty may be at stake.
Criminal defense attorneys serve as a safeguard against government overreach and ensure that the state is required to prove its allegations lawfully. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice rather than a conviction at any cost. Judges must remain fair, impartial and committed to applying the law.
Each role is different, but all three are necessary to the integrity of the justice system.
Yes. Judge Radford has served as a Tulsa County special judge since 2022. She is running for an elected district judge position.
She is a candidate for District Judge, District 14, Office 4.
The general election is scheduled for November 3, 2026. Only voters within the applicable judicial election district will see this race on their ballots.
This district-judge race is nonpartisan, meaning candidates appear on the ballot without a political-party designation.
A district judge presides over trial-court matters that may include criminal cases, civil disputes, motions, pleas, trials and sentencing. District judges also participate in courthouse administration and the selection of special judges.
Judges make decisions affecting freedom, families, property and access to justice. Reviewing each candidate’s experience and qualifications helps voters make informed choices in local judicial elections.
Watch Kaylind Landes’s complete conversation with Judge Loretta Radford to learn more about Oklahoma courts, sentencing, plea negotiations, trial preparation and the importance of local judicial elections.
Watch here: https://youtu.be/wX23MxZBYQo

About The Author
Managing Attorney at Landes Criminal Defense, Kaylind is a former prosecutor now focused on criminal defense in Northeastern Oklahoma. As an honors graduate of the University of Tulsa College of Law and an Order of the Barristers recipient, she uses her comprehensive experience on both sides of the courtroom to provide a holistic defense that minimizes disruption to her clients' daily lives.